I voted last night (we even brought Ivan along, although he slept through the whole voting process), which means that I'm allowed to complain about the results. So complain, I will.
A Conservative majority? Really? Canada, what were you thinking?!?! The Conservatives have shown contempt for parliament, shut down the house twice to avoid dealing with issues, broke their own election law (if not the letter of the law, at least the spirit of it), among other things, and you give them a majority? (Granted, over 60% of Canadians who cared enough to vote voted against the Conservatives.)
Stephen Harper and the Conservatives: Harper got the majority he wanted, and proved to Canada that he is the Teflon man. His FUD campaign worked, and he spooked people with the coalition boogey man. He somehow managed to convince people that he had something to do with Canada's economic recovery. He now has free reign for four years.
Elizabeth May and the Green Party: won in her riding, so we finally have a Green Party MP. It will be interesting to see what she does in Parliament. Maybe the Broadcasting consortium will have a harder time ignoring her next time.
The NDP: Official Opposition status, and the best election result they've ever had.
The Liberals: Michael Ignatief was probably the worst thing to happen to the Liberals for a long time. With the loss, Ignatief has resigned. Liberal Party of Canada, please pick someone good to lead you this time.
The Green Party: even though they finally have a seat, they dropped in the popular vote, but then, that's to be expected in a tight race, with first-past-the-post: the less-popular parties lose support as everyone votes for the lesser of two evils.
Michael Ignatief and the Liberals: the first time they ended up in third place. Nothing they attacked the Conservatives on would stick, and they were unable to make an issue out of anything. Ignatief even lost his own seat.
Gilles Duceppe and the Bloc: at one point, they were the official opposition, and now they don't even have official party status. Duceppe lost his own seat as well. Is this the beginning of the end for the Bloc? Or did Québec just get charmed by the NDP this time? If he wasn't a separatist, Duceppe would have probably made the best Prime Minister out of all the party leaders.
Canada: the Conservatives pulled off some stupid things when they were held in check by a minority. What will happen now that they don't have to care about what anyone else says?
Electoral reform is dead for the next four years. The NDP will push for it, but the Conservatives will ignore them. They've benefited a lot from the current system. Why would they change it?
Although Proportional Representation gets the most attention, I think that there is one major flaw with most PR systems: it gives independents a harder time. I would prefer a system in which voters rank candidates by preference. Condorcet would be my preference. STV/IRV would be my second pick. Even Approval voting would be an improvement. Note that these systems are not necessarily mutually exclusive with Proportional Representation. But I think that the calls for PR would be lessened if we used one of the above systems.
Someone has been telling people that their polling station has moved. Nobody knows who is behind it, yet, but it's quite a serious offence, and I hope that whoever it is gets found out.
No, not that kind of hash. The NIST is holding a contest for a new cryptographic hash function. Vulnerabilities have been found in the most commonly used hash functions, MD5 and SHA-1, and the contest is for the new SHA-3 standard. The deadline for submissions was last Friday, so if you missed it, too bad.
Schneier et al. have submitted their algorithm, called skein, and Rivest et al. have submitted MD6.
The NIST held a similar contest several years back for encryption algorithms, which resulted in Rijndael being officially named as the Advanced Encryption Standard. That contest took 5 years. We'll see how long this one takes. Hashing is generally less well-understood, and harder to do, than encryption.
(see also: /.)
The National Research Council has released a 352-page report that tells us what most of us knew already: trying to use data mining to find bad guys doesn't work very well. The problem being that there are too many false positives.
Whether or not this will actually stop anyone from trying to do it anyways remains to be seen.
At least, Elvis’ passport was sighted. And despite being dead, Elvis managed to get a new “un-forgeable” RFID passport.
Security researchers managed to modify an RFID-based passport so that it seems to belong to “Elvis Aaron Presley,” complete with photo.
The problem is not so much with the ability to forge passports, but rather with the claims that they are un-forgeable, and the false sense of security. If security personnel believe that the passports are un-forgeable, then we actually become less secure because of it.
(see also: Globe and Mail)
From the article:
CBC News has learned that 16 Canadian lakes are slated to be officially but quietly "reclassified" as toxic dump sites for mines. The lakes include prime wilderness fishing lakes from B.C. to Newfoundland.
Environmentalists say the process amounts to a "hidden subsidy" to mining companies, allowing them to get around laws against the destruction of fish habitat.
...
A local environmentalist who attended the Long Harbour meeting, Chad Griffiths, said of Sandy Pond: “It's easy enough to consider just one lake as just one lake, as a needed sacrifice, right? But it's not one lake … It's a trend. It's an open season on Canadian water.”
Blegh. Stupid government.
Read the article.
I have nothing more to add.
Update: CBC followup story: Fisheries minister defends the move. I like the reader's comment on the story that says:
I can remember back when the Fisheries Minister's job was to protect fish habitat, not peddle it to the highest bidder
This page was made from only the finest electrons.
© Hubert Chathi <><